<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How was the Employment opportunities for women during the second Industrial Revolution?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jobsandrecession.com/employment/how-was-the-employment-opportunities-for-women-during-the-second-industrial-revolution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jobsandrecession.com/employment/how-was-the-employment-opportunities-for-women-during-the-second-industrial-revolution</link>
	<description>Employment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 21:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: recession proof jobs</title>
		<link>http://jobsandrecession.com/employment/how-was-the-employment-opportunities-for-women-during-the-second-industrial-revolution/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>recession proof jobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jobsandrecession.com/employment/history/how-was-the-employment-opportunities-for-women-during-the-second-industrial-revolution#comment-12</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://jobsandrecession.com/Healthcare-In-The-Recession/free-weight-loss-for-teens-free-useful-info/jobs-for-teenagers-free-significant-guide/medical-terms-helpful-guidepost.php&quot;&gt;get a job today&lt;/a&gt;


You can read this:
While Pinchbeck spends most of her time describing the conditions of employment, she does on occasion pause to draw more general conclusions. Her central claim is that, on the whole, the Industrial Revolution made women better off. Initially women suffered from declining employment opportunities, but after the turn of the nineteenth century their prospects improved. Pinchbeck claims that women were better off in 1850 than in 1750 for two reasons. First, many women withdrew from the labor force and were able to enjoy more leisure and higher social standing. Pinchbeck sees the opportunity to specialize in housework as a privilege, and thus she sees withdrawal of some married women from the labor force as an improvement. While Pinchbeck notes that many women lost economic independence, she considers the gains to be large enough to make up for this loss. Noting the withdrawal of farmers&#039; wives from productive employment, she claims, &quot;In the change she sacrificed her former economic independence according to the extent to which she ceased to manage her household and contributed to the wealth of her family, but for her, the new conditions meant an advance in the social scale and did not entail any material hardship&quot; (Pinchbeck, p. 42). For Pinchbeck, the move toward a &quot;family wage,&quot; which allowed a man to support a family and allowed wives to withdraw from the labor force, was a clear advance. 

The second way in which women were better off in 1850 was in improved working conditions for those women who remained in the labor force. Pinchbeck notes that, while contemporaries thought factory conditions were bad, these conditions were actually better than the conditions in alternative employments in domestic industry. Women entering the factories did not leave behind ideal circumstances, but domestic industries with low pay and poor working conditions. Pinchbeck concludes that &quot;the Industrial Revolution has on the whole proved beneficial to women. It has resulted in greater leisure for women in the home and has relieved them from the drudgery and monotony that characterized much of the hand labour previously performed in connection with industrial work under the domestic system. For the woman workers outside the home it has resulted in better conditions, a greater variety of openings and an improved status&quot; (Pinchbeck, p.

and one more source:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jobsandrecession.com/Healthcare-&#73;&#110;-&#84;&#104;&#101;-Recession/free-weight-loss-&#102;&#111;&#114;-teens-free-useful-info/jobs-&#102;&#111;&#114;-teenagers-free-significant-guide/medical-terms-helpful-guidepost.php">&#103;&#101;&#116; a job today</a></p>
<p>&#89;&#111;&#117; &#99;&#97;&#110; read &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115;:<br />
&#87;&#104;&#105;&#108;&#101; Pinchbeck spends &#109;&#111;&#115;&#116; &#111;&#102; &#104;&#101;&#114; time describing &#116;&#104;&#101; conditions &#111;&#102; employment, &#115;&#104;&#101; &#100;&#111;&#101;&#115; &#111;&#110; occasion pause &#116;&#111; draw more general conclusions. &#72;&#101;&#114; central claim &#105;&#115; &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116;, &#111;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; whole, &#116;&#104;&#101; Industrial Revolution &#109;&#97;&#100;&#101; women better &#111;&#102;&#102;. Initially women suffered &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; declining employment opportunities, &#98;&#117;&#116; &#97;&#102;&#116;&#101;&#114; &#116;&#104;&#101; turn &#111;&#102; &#116;&#104;&#101; nineteenth century &#116;&#104;&#101;&#105;&#114; prospects improved. Pinchbeck claims &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; women &#119;&#101;&#114;&#101; better &#111;&#102;&#102; &#105;&#110; 1850 &#116;&#104;&#97;&#110; &#105;&#110; 1750 &#102;&#111;&#114; two reasons. First, many women withdrew &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; &#116;&#104;&#101; labor force &#97;&#110;&#100; &#119;&#101;&#114;&#101; &#97;&#98;&#108;&#101; &#116;&#111; &#101;&#110;&#106;&#111;&#121; more leisure &#97;&#110;&#100; higher social standing. Pinchbeck sees &#116;&#104;&#101; opportunity &#116;&#111; specialize &#105;&#110; housework &#97;&#115; a privilege, &#97;&#110;&#100; thus &#115;&#104;&#101; sees withdrawal &#111;&#102; &#115;&#111;&#109;&#101; married women &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; &#116;&#104;&#101; labor force &#97;&#115; &#97;&#110; improvement. &#87;&#104;&#105;&#108;&#101; Pinchbeck notes &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; many women lost economic independence, &#115;&#104;&#101; considers &#116;&#104;&#101; gains &#116;&#111; &#98;&#101; large enough &#116;&#111; &#109;&#97;&#107;&#101; up &#102;&#111;&#114; &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; loss. Noting &#116;&#104;&#101; withdrawal &#111;&#102; farmers&#8217; wives &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; productive employment, &#115;&#104;&#101; claims, &#8220;&#73;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; change &#115;&#104;&#101; sacrificed &#104;&#101;&#114; former economic independence according &#116;&#111; &#116;&#104;&#101; extent &#116;&#111; &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; &#115;&#104;&#101; &#99;&#101;&#97;&#115;&#101;&#100; &#116;&#111; manage &#104;&#101;&#114; household &#97;&#110;&#100; contributed &#116;&#111; &#116;&#104;&#101; wealth &#111;&#102; &#104;&#101;&#114; family, &#98;&#117;&#116; &#102;&#111;&#114; &#104;&#101;&#114;, &#116;&#104;&#101; &#110;&#101;&#119; conditions meant &#97;&#110; advance &#105;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; social scale &#97;&#110;&#100; &#100;&#105;&#100; &#110;&#111;&#116; entail &#97;&#110;&#121; material hardship&#8221; (Pinchbeck, p. 42). &#70;&#111;&#114; Pinchbeck, &#116;&#104;&#101; &#109;&#111;&#118;&#101; toward a &#8220;family wage,&#8221; &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; allowed a man &#116;&#111; support a family &#97;&#110;&#100; allowed wives &#116;&#111; withdraw &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; &#116;&#104;&#101; labor force, &#119;&#97;&#115; a clear advance. </p>
<p>&#84;&#104;&#101; second way &#105;&#110; &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; women &#119;&#101;&#114;&#101; better &#111;&#102;&#102; &#105;&#110; 1850 &#119;&#97;&#115; &#105;&#110; improved working conditions &#102;&#111;&#114; those women &#119;&#104;&#111; remained &#105;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; labor force. Pinchbeck notes &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116;, &#119;&#104;&#105;&#108;&#101; contemporaries &#116;&#104;&#111;&#117;&#103;&#104;&#116; factory conditions &#119;&#101;&#114;&#101; &#98;&#97;&#100;, &#116;&#104;&#101;&#115;&#101; conditions &#119;&#101;&#114;&#101; actually better &#116;&#104;&#97;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; conditions &#105;&#110; alternative employments &#105;&#110; domestic industry. Women entering &#116;&#104;&#101; factories &#100;&#105;&#100; &#110;&#111;&#116; leave behind ideal circumstances, &#98;&#117;&#116; domestic industries &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; low pay &#97;&#110;&#100; poor working conditions. Pinchbeck concludes &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#8220;&#116;&#104;&#101; Industrial Revolution &#104;&#97;&#115; &#111;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; whole proved beneficial &#116;&#111; women. &#73;&#116; &#104;&#97;&#115; resulted &#105;&#110; greater leisure &#102;&#111;&#114; women &#105;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; home &#97;&#110;&#100; &#104;&#97;&#115; relieved &#116;&#104;&#101;&#109; &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; &#116;&#104;&#101; drudgery &#97;&#110;&#100; monotony &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; characterized much &#111;&#102; &#116;&#104;&#101; hand labour previously performed &#105;&#110; connection &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; industrial work under &#116;&#104;&#101; domestic system. &#70;&#111;&#114; &#116;&#104;&#101; woman workers outside &#116;&#104;&#101; home &#105;&#116; &#104;&#97;&#115; resulted &#105;&#110; better conditions, a greater variety &#111;&#102; openings &#97;&#110;&#100; &#97;&#110; improved status&#8221; (Pinchbeck, p.</p>
<p>&#97;&#110;&#100; one more source:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

